PR Week PR Misstake: How An "Invitation" to Speak Went Wrong
This is a cautionary tale of how not to approach bloggers, and a definition of what an "invitation to speak" really means.
I was recently asked to participate on a speaking panel at a PRWeek-hosted conference in London. The program was titled
"PR, Social Networking And Blogging In Practice."
My panel was titled "Bloggers Speak Out" and was designed to understand what it is that motivates those who blog, and how PR professionals "can successfully approach bloggers to build good relationships and how they should engage with bloggers differently to traditional forms of press."
The email I was sent was titled "PR Week personal speaker invitation for Mr Ibsen." The invitation said they "would be delighted if you would be able to join us."
I responded immediately, saying I would be honored to accept their invitation.
Several days later I received a note: "Many thanks for the reply, however we have now filled this spot on our panel."
Seems that the fine folks at PR Week sent way too many "personal invitations" out to speakers.
Now, if this was an "invitation to submit an application to be considered," I would not be writing this post. However, the fine folks at PR Week simply sent an invitation to speak. In my book, this is akin to inviting someone to a wedding, and when you RSVP, you're told "we're all filled up. Maybe next time."
Before you call me petty, consider the topic of the conference: "PR, Social Networking And Blogging In Practice." and my panel in particular on how PR professionals "can successfully approach bloggers to build good relationships and how they should engage with bloggers differently to traditional forms of press."
Perhaps someone who DID make it on to the panel can use this as an example of how PR professionals should NOT engage bloggers, and as a case study on how NOT to build good relations with bloggers.


