My Photo

Subscribe

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 08/2005

.

Saturday, May 17, 2008

10 Auto Brands That Ought-to Go.

Hummerh2safariBusinessweek took aim at 10 floundering car brands--cars and companies we may be able to do without. They say that there are too many brands and not enough buyers.

Many auto-industry insiders agree weak ones should go, but it's not that easy.

While some of you out there may be still mourning the demise of Oldsmobile and Plymouth, others wonder why Pontiac and Mercury still exist.

Here's my take on the 10 brands that Businessweek says may be headed for the junk heap before long:

GMC may be too much of a niche brand. It may have rested nicely in the bosom of the gas-guzzling '90s, but if its recent hybrid attempt is any indication of how it plans to fit in to the days of $4 a gallon gas, (it gets 50% better mileage in city driving. However, that’s still only 21 mpg), I say its days are numbered.

Like GMC, Hummer must outlive its gas-guzzling reputation. And, are there really that many guys out there who need their manhood extended by driving a tank?

Jaguar has to stop building cars like the Jaguar X-Type, which reminded too many people of a Ford Taurus.

Land Rover is probably the most viable of the SUV niches, based on its reputation and customer devotion, so I wonder if its recent acquisition by Tata Motors will be the good luck Land Rover's been waiting for as it changes hands for the third time in the last 15 years.

Lincoln needs more like its new MKS, MKL, MKZ to distance itself from its brand association with the Lincoln Town Car, who, with an average age around 70, is one of the oldest in the industry.

Maybach an expensive hobby for Mercedes-Benz, and one that we can all do without.

Mercury is an undifferentiated brand, that has had a lack of new product for the last 30 or 40 years.

Pontiac sales are a small fraction of its heyday. Time to merge with Buick

Saab lost its soul when GM tried to "fix it" Time to put this soul to rest.

Volvo: safety stance ain't enough any more.

FAO Schwarz To Open Private Label Stores-Within-Stores Inside Macy's

174960689_f8a97c9cd3Both FAO Schwarz and Macy's are venerable brands who've each seen some hard times. Each company is around 150 years-old and can certainly claim an iconic brand status.

So the announcement that FAO will open toy stores in close to 700 Macy's department stores over the next two years is good news for the brands.

"Our two brands have a combined history of 296 years of bringing joy and retail magic to consumers," said Edward Schmults, chief executive officer of FAO Schwarz. "I am thrilled that, through Macy's, we will be able to offer the FAO Schwarz products to every American family."

About 75 full-size FAO toy stores will open across the country in the fall, along with about 200 smaller shops that will be up to 300 square feet, the companies said.

"This is an outstanding partnership that will bring toys back to Macy's in an exciting and unique way," said Lundgren, chairman, president and chief executive officer of Cincinnati-based Macy's. "FAO Schwarz is the world's most famous toy retailer with interesting and distinctive products that appeal to our customers and will drive store traffic, particularly to our children's departments."

FAO Schwarz will continue to operate own stores, including a flagship store on New York's Fifth Avenue.

Friday, May 16, 2008

The Makeover of Kodak

Kodak
Polaroid may be gone, but it looks like Kodak may be here to stay--albeit it in a morphed form to adapt to current trends.

Kodak prides itself as being a highly savvy marketing organization. It has transformed itself from a traditional maker and marketer of cameras, film and papers into a key competitor in the digital marketplace in which it now operates.

Kodak now has 19 products, each being number 1, 2 or 3 in their respective markets. Half of these products did not exist 10 years ago. Kodak has made dramatic shifts within its workforce. At its peak in 1988, Kodak had 150,000 people compared to 27,000 today. 60% of the current workforce consists of people who are new to the company within the past four years.

Staying true to the founder's mission, making strategic acquisitions and fostering a "culture of innovation" and "accountability" are some of the tactics Kodak has used to stay ahead in business.

In an article in IndustryWeek, the company's chief business development officer reveals some of the challenges Kodak has faced and how the company overcame them.

Urban Dictionary Word of the Day: "Bad Fuel Day"

5 Blogs Before Lunch is having a bad fuel day:

The mood or feeling one experiences after having just filled his or her vehicle with $4.00+ per gallon gasoline. (Usually consists of a sense of great economic despair, impending doom, anger, frustration, depression and/or a combination of all the above)

"Leave me alone. I'm having a bad fuel day!"

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

More, More, More Comcast Commercials

General Electric to Sell Appliances Unit

Ge_aviation
GE may no longer be putting its "imagination to work" on your household appliances.

Even though it is only a small part of General Electric's $173 billion organization, the announcement of the intended sale of GE's appliance business, or "white goods" unit is emotional. For over 100 years GE has been in American homes. Refrigerators, freezers, electric and gas ranges, dishwashers, clothes washers and dryers, microwave ovens and air conditioners, have been sold under brands including GE Profile and Hotpoint.

But today, GE did indeed announce plans to start an auction for its appliances business. The Wall Street Journal is reporting that GE hired Goldman Sachs to run an auction for the appliances unit, which could fetch between $5 billion and $8 billion.

GE entered the appliance business in 1907 and boasts of milestones such as introducing the first room air-conditioner in 1930.

Time For Carl Iachn To Try His Hand At The Yahoo!/Microsoft Match-up

14yahoo190Seems there may be another twist in the Yahoo!/Microsoft dance.

Carl Icahn is clearly a guy who revels in being in the middle of a muddy battle. The New York Times is reporting that Icahn looks to be pushing for seats on the board of Yahoo in hopes of pressuring the company to restart talks to sell itself to Microsoft.

Icahn may have bought as many as 50 million shares of Yahoo -- worth more than $1 billion -- and is considering a proxy fight according to The Times.

The press calls him an "activist investor." I call him a power junkie who must love the action and intrigue of boardroom battles. His brand reputation is that of someone who likes to agitate for change at some of the nation’s biggest companies. He's taken his brawling behavior to TWA, Time Warner, Oracle and Blockbuster--only to name a few of his prey.

Direct-to-Consumer Drug Advertising: Marketing, Education or Deception?

I have spoken my peace about drug marketing before. Now it is time for Congress, and the Los Angeles Times to weigh in.

There's an excellent article in this morning's 'Times (yes, the other one you NY-focused fanatics) that tackles the controversial issue of whether or not ads on TV for prescription drugs frequently go too far in touting a particular pill's benefits without adequately presenting the risks, and how the basic nature of consumer-directed prescription drug advertising has altered the doctor/patient relationship.

Marketing, it seems has changed the relationship dynamic, with patients essentially calling the shots when it comes to prescription drugs. The whole issue has been the focus of a recent congressional hearing that asked the question, "Direct-to-Consumer Advertising: Marketing, Education or Deception?"

From The Los Angeles Times:

This isn't a new debate. But one particularly striking aspect of last week's hearing was that it pitted doctors against drug companies, with the former saying that DTC ads do more harm than good and the latter basically ignoring what the doctors had to say.

Doctors dislike DTC ads because the campaigns typically place marketing ahead of education and force doctors to dissuade patients from demanding some drug they saw on TV rather than accepting a cheaper generic version or an alternative therapy. Drug makers, needless to say, see things differently.

Here is their take on the situation:

"Surveys show that DTC advertising brings patients into their doctors' offices and helps start important doctor-patient conversations about conditions that might otherwise go undiagnosed or untreated," Ken Johnson, senior vice president of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, said in a statement.

According to the LAT, spending on DTC advertising more than quadrupled from 1996 to 2005, from $985 million to $4.2 billion. Total promotional spending by the pharmaceutical industry rose to $29.9 billion in 2005 from $11.4 billion in 1996. This clearly is an issue, and a controversial one at that, that will not go away any time soon.

British Ad Banned As It "implied that an orgy was taking place"

Skinsposter460
The British advertising watchdog group, The Advertising Standards Authority, has banned an ad for a TV teen show after dozens of complaints that the "orgy" of nudity and sex depicted was offensive and unsuitable to be seen by children.

The campaign for "Skins" included four ads, one featuring the character Michelle on the edge of a bed with, as the Guardian UK described as having "smudged makeup, looking dishevelled and wearing only underwear." She is surrounded by couples in various states of undress with another character, Sid, naked but for a pillow on his lap.

The ASA said it was banning the ad because it "implied that an orgy was taking place". The organization rejected a smaller number of complaints about a second Skins as, which showed an aerial view of a dirty bathroom with one of the characters, Tony, lying submerged in the bath staring upwards as if he was dead.

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Did Propel Pull Product Placement Promo From Bravo TV Reality Series "Workout" And Why Should We Care?

Propel Fitness Water (a Gatorade company) has been a product placement sponsor of the Bravo TV fitness reality show "Workout" for the last couple of seasons. It has been a nice tie-in. At least until the show got itself in (forgive-me) hot water with the folks at Propel.

In a recent episode, two "characters" displayed a significant lack of sensitivity as they were overheard on tape gossiping about how "fake" a clients breasts were. Turns out the client had re-constructive breast surgery after breast cancer surgery. They were "caught" in their gossiping by the woman's boyfriend (off camera), and apparently apologized to him, and to the viewers of the "reality" show on camera.

The after-affect of this episode was the apparent pulling of the sponsorship by Propel. I say apparent because I have not yet been able to find a mainstream media source of a statement from Propel stating that they are indeed pulling the sponsorship. There are several reports by bloggers, but they seem to all pull back on one another as sources.

But, regardless of whether Propel pulled the sponsorship or not, the bigger, and perhaps more murky question for us marketers is, when do we abandon our sponsorship commitments? How offensive must an action be? Should a marketer respond because of our personal offensive of the comments by the cast members, or because of viewer and consumer outrage--or both?

The answer may just be like the definition of obscenity.

Media Buyers Are Using "Advertising Value Index" and "Content Power Ratings" to Match Advertisers With Consumers

Rcatk41abc1_2ABC's new "Advertising Value Index" allows advertisers to come up with the programs that their target consumers are likely to watch based on more than 15 points of criteria, including income level, education, employment status, how long viewers tune in to commercials or how engaged they are with the program.

Media buyers are using these and other new evaluation tools when buying ads. The Wall Street Journal points to an example of media firm Optimedia which is using a new measurement system called "Content Power Ratings." The tool uses 11 metrics, such as tracking blog posts about a show or measuring viewership online and on mobile phones to measure the content of TV programs.

From The WSJ: "We don't just rely on Nielsen [ratings]," says Larry Novenstern, executive vice president of NewCast@Optimedia. The tool helps the firm not only figure out where to buy ads but also where to develop product placement and other integration deals. "Everyone is talking about content. This is the true measure of content."

Gay and Lesbian Consumers Like Their HBO, But Aren't Fans of Wal-Mart, Exxon Mobil and Dunkin' Donuts

Gaywalmart082406
According to a new study, more than two-thirds of gay and lesbian consumers in the United States say they are more likely to buy from a company they considered to be gay-friendly, a perception they base largely on a company's advertising, followed by input from friends and the media.

Bravo, Apple, Showtime, HBO, Absolut, and Levi's, are the gay-friendliest brands, while WalMart, Dunkin
Donuts, Cracker Barrel (no, not Crate & Barrel), Exxon Mobil, and Samsung earn the lowest marks from gay and lesbian consumers, according to the 2008 Prime Access/PlanetOut Gay and Lesbian Consumer Study.

The survey is one of the largest and most comprehensive surveys of gay and lesbian consumer habits and brand perceptions. A total of 2,259 adults aged 18-64 participated in the study.

More from the press release on PRNewsire.

Bubble Gum May Rise Again

2569024_idIn another case of "what's old is new again" Cadbury is trying to revitalize the bubble-gum market among teens--and beyond.

Different than chewing gum, bubble gum requires a certain style and bold behavior. Popping, blowing and smacking haven't been popular since the 1980's.

Bubble gum is also often associated with children, but Cadbury believes its appeal could be extended. 'People are prepared to be quite experimental with gum," says their chief scientist "There are opportunities for the delivery of unique taste and eating experiences."

Cadbury owns the Bubbaloo brand, while Hubba Bubba is owned by rival Wrigley.

Let the smacking, and popping and blowing begin.

Monday, May 12, 2008

All Hail The Return Of Michael Dell

1808wb0
When a founding CEO returns from retirement, you know their's a problem with the mothership. Apple was in shambles before Steve Jobs re-entered the picture and re-built one of the iconic brands to profitability. Recently, Howard Schultz started shaking things up at Starbucks trying to return it to its core. Jerry Yang's much-needed return to Yahoo! is reaping questionable results. And, Michael Dell's return to the company's CEO spot is creating a lot of change at the computer company that bares his name.

And boy, is change what Dell needs.

Once the world's biggest maker of personal computers, Dell has lost its crown to Hewlett-Packard, and share prices, brand reputation and consumer confidence have faltered.

Second-time CEO Dell is generating a push into social media, retail shops and emerging markets. And suddenly the company is beginning to regain market share. Its move to sell "stylish" computers is paying off. But, as the Economist says, there is still much to do if he is to achieve his goal of turning his company, commercially speaking, from a Texan unilateralist into a global multilateralist.

An excerpt from the Economist:

Ever since Mr Dell started selling computers, he has focused on a different sort of innovation from the rest of the industry. In contrast to Apple, for instance, Dell has never worried about designing sexy devices or building a global network of fancy shops. Instead, the firm tried to make a commodity of customisation. It allowed clients to choose the features they wanted, but kept costs down by selling only online, using generic parts and maintaining an impossibly lean supply chain. This model went down well with corporate customers, particularly in America, where Dell remains number one.

Turning customisation into a commodity served Dell exceptionally well, and not just in the PC market: it successfully used the same approach with server computers, printers and storage devices. Yet just when the firm seemed unstoppable, its world began to change. Growth migrated from corporate markets to consumers and from rich countries to emerging markets, where people are warier of shopping online. What is more, as PCs became more powerful, buyers could no longer be persuaded to add extra processing power or a bigger hard drive when they bought them—one of the firm's specialities. Profits began to erode. Add exploding batteries, deteriorating customer service and accounting problems to the mix, and it is easy to see why Mr Dell felt he needed to come back.

Consumers Are Picking Sides In The Climate Change Fight--They Want Companies and Their Brands To Make Change

600pxglobesvg
A global study of 11,000 online interviews and 18 focus groups conducted by Ipsos found that in two-thirds of the markets researched people expect that companies and their brands should be finding solutions to climate change rather than the government.

The study, commissioned by Havas Media, was conducted in the US, UK, Germany, France, Spain, Mexico, Brazil, India and China, and showed that consumers are calling on brands to take responsibility for reducing the impact of climate change.

More interestingly, the report revealed that consumers are becoming increasingly aware of who is credibly making changes and who is not, despite green stereotypes associated with different sectors.

Greenwashing just ain't workin' folks!

Nearly 80% of consumers would rather buy from companies doing their best to reduce their impact on the environment, while nearly 90% are likely to buy more green goods in the next 12 months and 35% are willing to pay a premium for those goods.

The survey suggests that consumer awareness of the damage done by particular companies and sectors is growing increasingly sophisticated. Companies which fail to act responsibly can no longer expect to hide behind generally positive perceptions of the sector in which they operate.

Source: Brand Republic, plus, PR release and webcast inofrmation

Sunday, May 11, 2008

Proclivity: A Software Solution To A Marketer's Problem

Approach3
As readers of this blog know, I can be a bit of a skeptic when it comes to e-commerce marketing technologies created by techies or scientists. I feel that such marketing software is a little bit like diet pills--they promise a cure-all, but all they end up delivering is marketing hype.

So, as a skeptic of such things, I started reading an article in Fast Company about a company called Proclivity, founded by a genetics scientist turned software impresario, with my usual sideways glance.

Through description and testimonial, the article began to convince me that science is indeed advancing, and that Proclivity might have a superior product to much that is on the market.

Proclivity sorts through the data left by millions of anonymous people clicking around a company's web site, and predicts who's likely to buy which products, when, and at what price.

"When a vendor comes to you using all those words -- 'integration,' 'low-tech,' 'turnkey solution' -- it's scary," says Larry Promisel, VP of e-commerce at Barneys (one of Proclivity's clients). He is bombarded by sales pitches from similar companies, many of which track basic customer patterns. But Proclivity's software brought all of the information together, and took the further step of predicting customer behavior. "We tried to trip up their system," Promisel says. "Sheldon would suggest which designers would be big for us, and we'd separately make our own judgment based on the store. And he was right." Once the firm was hired, Proclivity spent two months collecting data -- letting the computer model learn (the early predictions were sometimes less than accurate) -- and another four months testing. "We had to teach them a bit about luxury retail. They butchered the names of our designers," Promisel chuckles, citing Dolce & Gabbana and Manolo Blahnik as victims.

One the thing that struck me as I read that article is the significance of the role of marketer in making such software successful. Simply having the ability to precisely target customers in its email campaigns is not enough. A marketer's role is to take that data, and nuturer the customer relationship. Just having the consumer behavior intelligence is not enough--being committed to using it to build a brand is an entirely different proposition.

As Proclivity founder Sheldon Gilbert says, "Scientists understand how complex systems work...I'm a pattern hunter, so I created a system that was looking for patterns and was adaptive and self-learning."

So, after the patterns have been laid out, it is up to the marketer to take those patterns and create advertising messages that intrigue and entice customers, and to follow-up with a brand experience that keeps them coming back.

Thanks to Proclivity, retailer' Barneys now knows what time people like to buy (lunchtime) and which products are likely to sell well in pairs (handbags and wallets). And based on Proclivity's feedback, Barneys also redesigned its e-campaign formats. Unlike the kind that cram in 5 to 12 products ("Spring Tie Sale!"), a typical Barneys email sticks with one product from one designer: "Manolo Blahnik: Pretty in Pink" features an image of a sparkling pink high heel on a pedestal.

That's it. That's the marketer's secret sauce.

I'd say I'm almost a believer now.

More on Proclivity in Men's Vogue

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Ads For Beyonce's Children's Line Are Promoting Itty-bitty Hoochie Mamas

Hodgirls1Ads for singer Beyonce's new children's clothing line feature child models in high heels with heavily made-up faces. Is she encouraging children to want to dress up as prostitutes? I don't quite get it. Needless to say, the provocative pics that introduce the kindergarten set to stilettos are stirring up well-deserved controversy for the singer.

From StyleDash:

To be fair, the clothing itself isn't all that bad. Not good, either, but not quite as "Go on, baby, and earn your lunch money the old fashioned way" as the ads make them appear. But seriously, who's going to want their daughter associated with the clothing in these ads? You know, besides Mrs. Knowles ...

Hodgirlsasd

Uma Thurman Sues Lancome

Lancome_2
Uma Thurman is claiming in a lawsuit that Lancome, owned by L'Oreal SA continues to use her image in advertising and marketing, years after a licensing agreement expired.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the $5 million + lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, alleges Lancome Parfuns et Beaute & Cie is using Ms. Thurman's likeness without her permission and has failed to give notice as required to third parties permitted by Lancome to use her likeness to promote Lancome products that they must cease doing so. Ads apparently have continued to run in Canada and Asia.

Lancome claims the licensing agreement frees it from liability if third parties continue to use her image after the contract expired.

Friday, May 09, 2008

Were The Women In Dove's "Real Women" Campaign Re-Touched?

Dove_wideweb__430x327
A new controversy over Dove's "Campaign for real beauty" ads is brewing as questions arise over the "pureness" of the images of women in the ad.

The photographs of women of all sizes could have been significantly retouched, claims airbrush artist Pascal Dangin in an article in the May 12 issue of the New Yorker. The artist claims that he retouched the photo of women in their underwear used in one of the campaign's earliest executions.

The New Yorker article was clearly not an expose on Dove, but a story about the mastery of Dangin as a re-touching artist. That said, there is this excerpt which is causing a stir: "It turned out that it was a Dangin job. 'Do you know how much retouching was on that?' he asked. 'But it was great to do, a challenge, to keep everyone's skin and faces showing the mileage but not looking unattractive'."

If the allegations are proved to be true it could be very damaging to Dove's four-year campaign and to its ad agency Ogilvy & Mather.

Brand Republic says that: It would be particularly hypocritical following Dove's popular viral video 'Dove Evolution', which shows an attractive but bare-faced woman transformed with make-up, styling and retouching into a stunning model. It ends with the line "no wonder our perception of beauty is distorted".

Controversy to continue...

Goodby Silverstein & Partners Turns 25

Bu_goodby08_621_wardThe San Francisco agency Goodby, Silverstein & Partners is celebrating it's 25th birthday.

I remember interviewing at their offices (then called Goodby, Berlin & Silverstein) on Front Street when they were a mere 10 years-old. I was hired by a guy that they fired the next day. I got a call from Rich Silverstein apologizing for my one-day stint at the agency (actually I never stepped foot in the office as an employee). All-in-all they handled it really well, and I have nothing but good things to say about the agency.

GS&P was started in 1983 by Hal Riney alums Jeff Goodby, Rich Silverstein and Andy Berlin. It's gone from humble beginnings to become a major player in the agency world, with more than $1 billion in billings and agency of the year honors this year from Adweek and Advertising Age.

More at San Francisco Chronicle

Thursday, May 08, 2008

Microsoft to Facebook: Care To Dance?

Microsoft has turned its amorous attention away from Yahoo!, directing a little love towards Facebook.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Microsoft's bankers put out subtle signals to Facebook, the social networking Web site, to see if it would be open to a full acquisition. Last October Microsoft agreed to buy a $240 million piece of the company in a transaction that values Facebook at $15 billion.

In the past, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has resisted selling the entire company.

Starwood CEO Hires Former Colleague To Run Marketing

Starwood_logosProving once again that maintaining business relationships are a key to success (for everyone involved), Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide CEO Frits van Paasschen has hired a former colleague--Phil McAveety, from his days at Nike, to be chief brand officer of the hotel chain.

For van Paasschen it is an opportunity to hire a tested resource who he's seen perform on a first-hand basis. For McAveety it is an opportunity to jump into a position with a level of trust he might not otherwise receive if he was an un-known quantity.

McAveety reportedly will be responsible for all aspects of marketing and brand performance for the company's portfolio, which includes Le Meridien, Westin, Sheraton, W, St. Regis, the Luxury Collection, Four Points by Sheraton, aloft and Element. Additionally, he will oversee the Starwood Preferred Guest loyalty program, pr, market research, creative research, interactive marketing and partnership marketing.

From Brandweek:

"I've had the great pleasure to work with Phil in the past and I believe his brand expertise and broad international experience will be invaluable to Starwood as we continue to distinguish ourselves as a leading, global hospitality company with distinctive and compelling brands," van Paasschen said in a written statement.

PowerAde Wants You To Desire Hydration and Electrolytes with Zero Calories

Powerade786942Coca-Cola is trying to energize its sports-drink line with a zero-calorie PowerAde to compete with category king Gatorade and win a greater market share of the sports-drink market. Print ads for the drink, feature tennis star Venus Williams.

From USA Today: "PowerAde offers carbohydrates for those with intense workouts," says Matt Kahn, vice president of marketing. "But there's a whole group of calorie-conscious gymgoers. This is the first major brand to give hydration and electrolytes with zero calories."

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

5 Lawyers Punk'd Before Lunch: Diet Coke v. Coke Zero

Actual lawyers on hidden camera:

What is an Arby's, Anyway?

4805fb900033f068f3400cb8e1
Ever wonder where corporate names come from?

Despite most people's belief that Taco Bell is named after the bells in Spanish missions, it is actually named after founder Glen Bell of San Bernadino, CA.

Toyota is an American-ized version of the founder's family name: Toyoda (they thought Americans could more easily pronounce it with a "t." )

And, Wendy's, famously is the nickname of one of Dave Thomas' daughters.

But what about Arby's? According to their website, when Leroy and Forrest Raffel opened the first Arby’s in Boardman, Ohio on July 23, 1964, the brothers decided on a name which stands for R.B., the initials of the Raffel Brothers -- although many suspect the R.B. stands for roast beef.

Just some fun brand facts for a Wednesday morning...

How To Market An Unpopular Product

Hummerh37
The folks over at Wharton have been looking at how to market unpopular products. They say that creativity and understanding the customer's perspective are important when trying to sell unpopular products.

This should be true of all marketing programs.

They go on to say that understanding why it's unpopular (think Hummers and gas prices) is the first step that can then allow a marketer to create an offer that removes the objection. Knowing that products have life cycles and planning for the new before the old declines is also useful.

From Knowledge@Wharton:

While the ultimate goal of marketing is to target products to customers who are ready to buy, occasionally products or services require an additional push. When that happens, marketers need creative ideas to tide them over until the market returns or the company is able to change strategic direction, according to Wharton faculty and marketers. "From the individual marketer's point of view, there are times you feel selling something is impossible. But if you think more about it, there are so many different kinds of customers out there. You just need to find them," says Wharton marketing professor John Zhang.

If customers aren't buying, more often than not it is an indication that a company is targeting the wrong people. "We all know the saying about one man's trash being another man's treasure, and you just need to find the man who treasures your trash," Zhang quips. To find that man, a company must study its market and customers, figure out why its product is or is not clicking with certain segments, and decide what buttons it can push to get targeted customers excited. "Believe me, going through a systematic, rigorous process of segmentation, targeting and positioning -- an age-old marketing approach -- is much easier than finding a man who loves your trash," Zhang continues. "A selling job is always difficult if you don't really know your customers well and if you simply make projections based on your own experience and intuition. You think, 'If I hate this, everybody else will hate it.' But that assumption may not be true."

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

Co-Founder of Baskin-Robbins Heads Off Into The Ice Cream Sunset

1
Baskin-Robbins is now part of Dunkin' Brands Inc. and has more than 5,800 franchises worldwide.

But it all started over 60 years ago with brothers-in-law Burton (Burt) Baskin, Irvine Robbins and their 31 flavors (well, OK they actually started with 21 types).

Today, it was announced that co-founder Robbins passed away at the age of 90.

"Frankly, I never met a flavor I didn't like," Robbins told The New York Times in 1973.

Robbins opened his first ice cream store in Glendale, Calif., in December 1945, following his discharge from the Army. He used $6,000 from a cashed-in insurance policy his father had given him for his bar mitzvah.

As corporate policy, Baskin-Robbins employees were allowed to eat all the ice cream they wanted, because, Robbins said, "I don't want my employees stealing."

Absolut Is Marketing Itself as All-Natural

Absolut has announced that it is broadening its all-natural message as a way to distinguish itself in a crowded category.

Now, with a show of hands, how many of you knew there were "un-natural" vodkas out there?

Just as I thought.

In fact, the cynic in me believes there may not be a lot of un-natural vodkas out there, and that this is just an example of a unique selling proposition that is not based on a unique feature of the product.

The key to this feature-ownership strategy is to be first to lay claim, and have a big enough megaphone to own the positioning as unique.

Absolut may be in a position to do just that.

From Brandweek:

A new campaign, "Dissection," via TBWA\Chiat\Day, New York, will roll out over the next month in several international markets including the United Kingdom, Canada and Mexico. The push includes both TV and print executions that will initially focus on the brand's mango- and pear-flavored vodkas. Print ads show the fruit in a glass, being segmented into various cubes. Tag: "In an Absolut world true taste comes naturally."

"The campaign emphasizes the truly natural ingredients consumers can expect when drinking Absolut," said Nina Gillsvik, international brand director at Absolut Vodka. "Absolut embodies the true taste of vodka and only fresh ingredients are used, which leads to the best tasting cocktails."

Chrysler To Offer Gasoline at $2.99 Per gallon For 3 Years

20080506095209990014
Chrysler LLC Chairman and Executive Bob Nardelli has announced a promotion that makes the most of the current gasoline price inflation. It is a nice twist on the usual rebates and zero-percent interest incentives typically offered to consumers when economic times are tough.

The promo is a three-year, $2.99-a-gallon gasoline price guarantee for people who buy or lease new vehicles this month. The offer is based on 12,000 miles of driving per year at the vehicle's rated fuel economy--suggesting that the better fuel economy a car has, the better the offer.

Buyers will get a card for buying gas that is linked to the customer's own charge account. The customer will be billed $2.99 a gallon, and Chrysler will pay the rest.

Pricing for 2009 Super Bowl Ads Announced

Get your pocketbooks ready. NBC Universal plans to offer 30-second commercials at the 2009 Super Bowl for...wait for it...$3 MILLION dollars.

The Wall Street Journal reports that while individual slots have sold at that level before, it's never been the starting point for negotiations for the dozens of 30-second ads sold for the game. It represents a price increase of more than 10%, roughly double the usual annual rise.

Monday, May 05, 2008

Young Consumers Are Turning Up Their Noses at Old-fashioned Online Ads On Social Networking Sites

Mkap434_advert_20080504181705
It's very clear that regular display ads are not an effective revenue stream for today's social-networking sites.

Consumers are flocking to destinations like Facebook, Bebo and Meebo, but many still aren't clicking on the ads.

These site's younger users are used to interactive content online -- chatting with friends, or sharing photos or videos, and being in control of their viewing (and interacting) process, and will just ignore the traditional forms of advertising being thrust upon them.

They're turning up their noses at old-fashioned online ads.

New ad concepts must be developed in order to appeal to a younger audience -- The more interactive the ads, the more this audience will respond.

Some examples (all from The Wall Street Journal):


Online software company Slide lets users send virtual representations of different-flavored bottles of Vitaminwater to friends online through an application called "Top Friends." In eight days, Slide says, users sent 10 million "bottles" of Vitaminwater.

Meebo, which offers instant messaging and chat rooms, will start selling ads this quarter that users can forward to friends or even shut off, unlike traditional ads that stay on the computer screen. Some spots may contain movie trailers or computer games, which can be enlarged on screen and shared with friends.

The new Meebo ads can also be used to customize a user's Meebo page -- by substituting a photo of a movie star or a new CD cover for one's own "buddy icon" on the site, for instance. The company says that in trials, the spots have had much higher "click-through" rates -- the percentage of users who see the ad who actually click on it -- than traditional, more-static display ads.

And because many of these people construct elaborate personal home pages on sites like Facebook and News Corp.'s MySpace, they may not want ads encroaching on their space. At the same time, some marketers have been hesitant to advertise alongside unpredictable or racy content posted by users.

Bebo, which Time Warner's AOL recently agreed to purchase, is also trying out new ad models, including more-sophisticated product placements inside video dramas running on the site, such as the popular series "KateModern."

MySpace and Facebook are trying to tailor ads to people based on interests they highlight in their online profiles; someone who expresses an interest in cars might see an ad from Toyota Motor, for instance.

Other Web start-ups are using video-ad technology developed by fellow start-up VideoEgg. To promote its Office products, Microsoft has tested new VideoEgg technology that places ads containing videos or online games on a network of social-media and gaming sites. It says it is pleased with the results.

All these new ad concepts are at a nascent stage. Some will work, some won't--like any burgeoning industry. But one thing is clear, the days of traditional static ads--as a primary revenue stream for an online site catering to the newest generations, are over. Go interactive, baby--go interactive.

Yahoo! and Microsoft, The Morning After

800pxjerry_yang_and_david_filo
As Yahoo's shares tumbled in premarket trading the day after the Yahoo/Micorosft deal fell apart, the Monday Morning Quarterbacking (it is Monday afterall), began.

Is CEO Steve Ballmer playing hardball, and waiting until Yahoo! is in a more weakened state to re-bounce on the brand? Are Yahoo's chief executive, Jerry Yang, and Co-founder David Filo (both pictured above) too close, and emotionally attached to the brand to negotiate steely-eyed? So, as the Yahoo! team reportedly greets Microsoft's decision to leave Yahoo! alone is greeted as a victory, shareholders, media and consumers are likely to ask tough questions this week as Yahoo considers its next move.

More from: The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Seattle PI and The Los Angeles Times.

Sunday, May 04, 2008

The Greening of Dove, Thanks To Greenpeace

The folks over at Greenpeace are taking credit for convincing Unilever to stop destroying Indonesian rain forests for palm oil and begin buying the key ingredient in its popular Dove soaps only from suppliers who can demonstrate they haven't cut down forests.

Greenpeace's weapon in this battle: an ad campaign that uses parodies of the company's Dove ads encouraging self-esteem in women. Greenpeace's campaign included newspaper ads, fliers, and a video on YouTube.

Greenpeace, known for its activists demonstrations, used some traditional techniques as well: having Greenpeace activists dress up like orangutans and climb onto a roof at the company's headquarters in central London.

From The Wall Street Journal:

The speed of the campaign marks a big moment for activist groups. One Greenpeace ad has been watched more than 250,000 times in the week it has been on YouTube.com. Just as the world's biggest marketers have used such Internet sites to get their video ads to consumers, pressure groups are now using the technique to cheaply and quickly spread their message. Type "Dove" in YouTube's search engine and Greenpeace's ad is the first video to appear.

Greenpeace claimed credit for the change in Unilever policy, but a Unilever spokesman said the Greenpeace protests "had some bearing" but little influence on Unilever's decision to source palm oil. He said the company's policy has been in the works since November.

From The Wall Street Journal:

Big corporations are frequently targeted by environmental and other groups criticizing their behavior or that of their suppliers. In recent years the groups have become more sophisticated with marketing techniques to win public support. WWF, a global environmental group, has run newspaper advertisements targeting companies like Royal Dutch Shell PLC.

WWF chief spokesman David Cowdrey said Thursday that Greenpeace deserves some of the credit for Unilever's decision. "I am sure it helped but I don't think it was the be all and end all," he said.


Lindsay Lohan's Mugshot Used As The Face of Anti-Breathalizer Campaign

Lindsaylohandrunkdrivingad050208thuA full-page ad appeared in USA Today on Friday and was paid for by a trade group that supports the interests of the alcohol industry.

So where's the story here? Well, the trade group, the American Beverage Institute, is using actor/celebrity bad girl Lindsay Lohan's mug shot as the primary visual in an ad that promotes the use of in-car breathalyzers for repeat DUI offenders only.

It is an attack on devices that measure drivers' blood-alcohol level before their vehicle can start, for people who "casually" drink and drive.

Huh?

It is a bizarre claim, seemingly not worthy of a full page ad. Should the industry be anti-breathalyzers?

The ad suggests that ignition interlocks were fine for "hard-core" drunk drivers, and suggests that the wide use of such devices would bring an end to champagne toasts at weddings, wine at dinner and ballgame beers. They say the devices should only be reserved for repeat DUI offenders like the twice convicted actress. Lohan's lawyer angrily responded that "Lindsay Lohan fully endorses ignition interlock devices."

The ad reads "Ignition interlocks are a good idea for" above Lohan's mug shot from her July 24, 2007 arrest and "But a bad idea for us" above smaller photos of people drinking.

Interestingly, Lohan's camp decided to attack USA Today, not the American Beverage Institute for running the ad:

"USA Today is idiotic to run such an irresponsible advertisement suggesting that drinking and driving is some kind of American 'tradition' we should protect," Lohan's lawyer Blair Berk said in a statement. "Not identifying that this ad was paid for by the liquor and restaurant industries is profoundly reckless.

"Drunk white businessmen, drunk housewives out for girls night out and drunk wedding parties should be kept off the roads of America," Berk continued. "Lindsay Lohan fully endorses ignition interlock devices, which have been well-proven to save lives."

The American Beverage Institute stood by its use of Lohan's image.

More at CNN.com

Saturday, May 03, 2008

Microsoft Withdraws Bid For Yahoo!

The New York Times is reporting from sources that Microsoft has withdrawn its bid for Yahoo. According to the paper, the breakdown followed a meeting in Seattle on Saturday morning between Microsoft C.E.O. Steven A. Ballmer, Microsoft's chief executive, and Yahoo C.E.O. Jerry Yang, Yahoo's co-founder and chief executive. Apparently, Yahoo's other co-founder, David Filo, was in the meeting, along with Microsoft's Kevin Johnson, Mr. Ballmer increased Microsoft's offer to $33 a share, but Mr. Yang said Yahoo would not sell for less than $37 a share.

Was someone playing chicken, or was this deal just not right?

The value of customer input

Homemain01Recently, A.G. Lafley, chairman and CEO of Procter & Gamble (P&G to most) announced that “the customer is boss.” He actually went so far as to say "What the consumer's complaining about gives us opportunity to learn what we can do better.”

The quote, and the concept of customer as king garnered news around the globe. If you don’t believe me, check out the article in The International Herald Tribune on April 29, 2008 or, here on this blog a couple of days later.

But hasn’t, shouldn’t, the customer always been king?

Not so much.

In my consulting practice I work with companies large and small who have lost their way, and are looking for a good strong path to success. They’ve lost market share and/or mindshare, had a few too many product launches that were flops, or they may simply have been out-marketed by their competitors. What is often common among these companies is that they’ve not paid a whole lot of attention to their consumers.

Over the last decade of so, market research budgets have been slashed, and time-to-market goals have increased. Both have contributed to the bypassing of consumer input into the process of developing and marketing a product.

But there is hope.

P&G, Kraft Foods and other CPG (consumer packaged goods) companies are re-discovering that consumer feedback early in the product development process -- taking notice of its customers, is paying off. They’re making visits to consumers' homes, localizing product to adjust to geographic differences in consumer tastes. They have tightly woven the role and satisfaction of the consumer into their organizations.

CPG companies are, and should be, at the cutting edge of listening to their customers. When they do, they see sales, profits and stock prices climb.

This return to the customer as king—or “boss” as Mr. Lafley calls them, is good practice for businesses big and small. It is best to remember that even a business-to-business product is being bought by an individual—a consumer. Some of the best brands are ones that have rabid customer bases who believe that they “own” the brand, and will only accept a “perfect” brand experience—think about the success of Apple in this way.

I sometimes get a roll-of-the-eyes from administrators, and inward thinking executives when I talk to them about bringing the voice of the consumer into their organization—either by creating consumer personas that put a human face on their customers, or by assigning Consumer Advocates as an official job title. Worse yet is when I suggest a consumer advisory panel that interacts directly with company executives.
However, those who ignore their consumers, are doomed to suffer their wrath.

Let’s face it, today’s interest in consumer generated content, of online communities, of consumers creating their own ads on YouTube, is all a reaction—a back lash, to the idea that consumers are being ignored within organizations, and their resulting marketing, and products are being forced down the consumer’s throat.
I often speak on the topic of how the consumer is becoming increasingly sophisticated in their consumption of advertising and marketing. They tune in when they are entertained and informed with a genuine and authentic voice, and tune out when they smell marketing hype, or see products that are clearly designed (at least in their mind) to be taking advantage of them—of ignoring them, as consumers that can vote with their feet.

Coke and Pepsi bottlers are currently considering abandoning the 20-ounce bottle sold in convenience stores. Sales are slumping. They think consumers might think the bottle is too big, or maybe too small. But perhaps, they’ll find, as they begin their customer research, that it is mostly about price—consumers are savvy enough to not want to pay the same price for a 20-ounce Coke that they do for a 2-liter bottle in a grocery store. Nor are they interested in drinking a bottle that has more fluid than could fit in their bladder. Or, perhaps, they’ll discover something none of us had thought of—but the consumer knew all along.

They need to listen to the consumer as boss. And remember, the boss is always right.